GANDAKI PROVINCE MAINTAINS POLITICAL STABILITY AMIDST SHIFTING ALLIANCES ELSEWHERE

Pokhara. Signs of changing power equations are currently visible in various provinces of the country. This has already had a direct impact in Sudurpashchim, Karnali, and Koshi provinces. In some places, ministers are leaving the government, and in others, chief ministers are dismissing them.

In the remaining provinces, the relationship between ruling parties is not strong. However, Gandaki presents a different picture compared to other provinces. So far, a relatively cordial atmosphere has prevailed among the main political parties in Gandaki Province. Nevertheless, some matters are also decided based on central decisions, so the situation is uncertain. Regarding this matter, here is an edited excerpt of a conversation between RatoPati and Devaka Pahari, Chief Whip of the CPN (UML) Gandaki Province:

• As power equations are changing in other provinces, what kind of situation will arise in Gandaki Province?

Looking at the situation so far, there is a cordial atmosphere in Gandaki Province. Just yesterday, a cabinet meeting was held, which concluded very cordially. The policy and program and budget passing process also saw a smooth and positive environment here. Appointments in bodies like the Gandaki Pragya Pratishthan and Sports Council have also been finalized based on consensus. Therefore, up to the current situation, the environment in Gandaki Province is peaceful and well-managed compared to other provinces.

• While discussions are ongoing about changing equations in other provinces, its direct impact may also be seen in Gandaki. What will be the role of UML in Gandaki now?

The CPN (UML) Gandaki Province Parliamentary Party is not in a hurry or inclined towards power struggles at this moment. Our understanding is that it would be good to continue with the current equation and move forward. In the past, collaborations have moved forward based on written agreements. UML wants to play a mature and responsible role in the current situation.

• Can Gandaki Province send a new message, different from the political instability and power struggles seen in other provinces?

That is also our desire. Political parties must understand what message is being conveyed to the public when power changes repeatedly. The game of forming and collapsing governments does not benefit the country. Parties need to show maturity by learning from past experiences. Especially in the case of provinces, changing power will increase extreme disappointment among the public. This is because some people already have a negative perception of federalism. If Gandaki Province can convey a message of understanding and stability instead of instability, it will be positive. We will make that effort.

• Have there been any discussions or briefings within the parliamentary party regarding central decisions or political developments in other provinces?

Although detailed discussions on this matter have not yet taken place formally in the parliamentary party, we are monitoring the developments through various media and informal channels. Our clear suggestion is that the situation and power balance of all provinces are not the same. Where the government is functioning smoothly, the shadow of disputes elsewhere should not fall. We will send this suggestion from our side to the center as well.

• Has there been any dialogue between the ruling parties (Congress and UML) in Gandaki on this matter?

Informal dialogues are ongoing between the ruling parties. We are in continuous dialogue. Leaders of both parties are positive about how to move forward and maintain stability in the current situation. Until an official decision comes from the center, there is no situation to take new steps from the provincial level, but it is not a state of no dialogue.

• If the situation changes and a new equation needs to be formed, what will be UML's strategy?

While arithmetic is important in politics, stability and public expectation are more important. UML is not in favor of doing anything just for power. Even if the situation changes, we are ready to play the role of a responsible opposition. It is not necessary to be in power all the time; constructive cooperation can be provided for the development and prosperity of the province even from the opposition. We are moving forward with this thought. The rest will be seen after the decision is made.