Raksha Bam Continues to Question Government and System

Dhangadhi. The Genji movement gave birth to a new debate in Nepali politics. Raksha Bam, an activist of that movement, is still continuously raising questions about the government and the system. Her questions about the government and the system are still equally sharp.

Rato Pati has interviewed Raksha Bam focusing on the current state of the 'Genji' movement, her views on the new government, and issues of the Far-West. Here is the edited part of the conversation-

• Where has the Genji movement reached now?

Every movement has its time. The issues we raised – the fight against corruption and good governance – are not matters that can be resolved in a day or three months. This is a continuous process. As they say, 'The movement continues', it's like that. This movement has not subsided. The issues it raised are still equally relevant, and we are continuously raising our voices for them.

• There seems to be a division within the Genji movement now, why have different demands and groups been formed?

It is not necessary for an entire generation to have the same way of thinking. It is natural to have different opinions. There is no meaning in staying together by suppressing one's thoughts. It is a good thing that the friends who believe in this system and process have joined the government. At least we have representation in the government. We have access to remind them when we are on the streets. Having some on the streets and some in the government creates a kind of balance.

Initially, we were also optimistic about this government, but power not only gives strength to people but also makes them its captive.

• You also had the opportunity to join the government or lead, why were you afraid?

It's not fear, it's a search for political maturity. What is the point of just going to parliament, taking a salary from the people's tax money, but being unable to deliver? I did not want to go there in an immature state. My priority was not just to enter politics or get a position. The main responsibility during the transitional phase was to take the country to elections and provide a way out. Therefore, I focused more on responsibility than on position.

• There seems to be dissatisfaction with the new government, especially towards Prime Minister Balen Shah, why?

Initially, we were also optimistic about this government, but power not only gives strength to people but also makes them its captive. Whether it's the issue of squatters or flood management, some of the government's activities showed a glimpse of dictatorial tendencies. It is our duty to raise our voice when the same tendencies are repeated against which we took to the streets.

It is not my personal animosity towards individuals like Balen Shah or Rabi Lamichhane, but there are questions about their working style and delivery. If one gives false assurances to the public but cannot manage, then it cannot be successful leadership.

• You are also accused of being a 'foreign agent', how do you take this?

Initially, I felt hurt hearing such things. People think that no one can raise their voice selflessly. If I were a foreign agent or being manipulated, I would probably be in power now, wouldn't I? Why would I be on the streets? I have nothing now except the power of citizenship. If I were being manipulated, what would be easier than getting power and position? But I have no ulterior motive, so these accusations are completely baseless.

The Far-West is a victim of geographical discrimination. When we were studying, textbooks did not reach schools on time.

• Why do you think the country has not developed? Whose fault is it more?

The main thing is that we lack resources. Even the available resources are not distributed equally. Another reason is corruption and misgovernance. Those who reach leadership positions with the intention to build are themselves guilty, but citizens also have responsibilities. The country is not built by leaders alone; it is built by workers working, teachers teaching, and traders paying taxes honestly. Leaders only need to facilitate, which has not happened here.

• What are the main problems of the Far-West? How is Kathmandu looking at it?

The Far-West is a victim of geographical discrimination. When we were studying, textbooks did not reach schools on time. Party pamphlets reached faster than books, but textbooks did not. The condition of education, health, and employment is dire. When people mention the Far-West, they only see 'Chhaupadi', but they forget that there are 'Chhau rooms' in Kathmandu too. Instead of focusing on the development of our region and the issues here, the parties are busy with power equations. Proper distribution of resources is necessary to bring out the still-overlooked natural beauty of the Far-West and to improve the living standards of the people here.

My advice to the newly elected friends is – first understand the country, then try to build it.

• What is your path now? Will you form a new party or join the old ones?

I am still in politics. One does not have to form a party to do politics. What we eat, how much tax we pay, and which school we study in – all these are politics. Even if I am not affiliated with any party, I can be politically aware and active. For now, my path is to hold the citizens accountable and raise issues.

• Do you want to give any suggestions to the government?

My advice to the newly elected friends is – first understand the country, then try to build it. Those in leadership positions must have sensitivity, compassion, and empathy.