RSP MP Ganesh Parajuli Criticizes Demand for Results from 100-Day Government
Kathmandu. Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) MP Ganesh Parajuli has objected to those who have been in power for more than three decades demanding results from a 100-day government.
Expressing his views on social media Facebook, he commented that this question is not about 100 days but about political culture.
Parajuli mentioned that the public has already given their verdict through votes on who institutionalized the practice of keeping state structures under party influence for decades, making appointments and opportunities a matter of sharing, suppressing corruption cases, and weakening public trust. He stated that the same group is now showing the most impatience as the scope of law begins to reach influential individuals, investigations start breaking the circle of political access, and efforts are being made to implement good governance in practice.
He claimed that the criticism of 100 days is not just a question against the government but merely an expression of political discomfort to protect the structure of impunity built over the years. Parajuli said that although all problems of decades cannot be solved in 100 days, the government has clearly laid the foundation for reform.
He asserted that the government has sent a message that the law is equal for all and has clearly presented the political will to either protect corruption or bring it under investigation and eradicate it from the root. While emphasizing that results must certainly be demanded from the government and strong oversight should be exercised, he mentioned that the moral right to demand results becomes strong only when one is ready to account for their own three decades of politics.
He expressed the view that attempts to use 100 days as a political weapon by fleeing from the responsibility of three decades of failure will not change history, and this will further clarify who has a problem with change.
This specific news has been automatically translated by AI. As a result, there may be some inaccuracies or language errors.