P. Kharel Comments on Political Instability, Foreign Policy, and Judiciary

Journalism professor P. Kharel is also popular as a commentator and analyst. Kharel has practical and theoretical knowledge of journalism, as well as a subtle understanding of contemporary international politics. 

Professor P. Kharel, known for his clear views and neutral analysis, has had an in-depth conversation about the current power equation, the working style of political parties, deviations in foreign policy, and the violation of seniority within the judiciary. Ratopati has had a long dialogue with Professor Kharel, focusing on the direction of the country's internal and external policies amidst political instability, obstruction in parliament, disputes within the judiciary, and complexities in foreign relations. 

Edited excerpt from the conversation with Professor Kharel (detailed conversation can be watched and heard in the video):

• We did not get to hear your detailed analysis of the power equation formed on February 21st and the subsequent political events. How do you view the results of that election and the new equation?

Regarding the results of the election and the new political equation, I had conversations with many people four-five days before the first phase of the election's silence period began. At that time, I had predicted that the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) could become the largest party or come close to a majority. I have no hesitation in sharing this analysis. However, the results exceeded expectations, with a clear majority or close to a two-thirds majority being visible.

• So, this result was somewhat expected for you?

I was confident that the new force would become the largest party. However, there is always some difference between analysis done sitting in Kathmandu, warming oneself by the heater or in the sun, and the actual situation. There was also an analysis that even KP Sharma Oli might find it difficult to win the election and that Balen would win.

• This can also be understood as a historic starting point or a new record. Many have paid close attention to the events of August 23rd and 24th in particular. What is your perspective on those events?

In the background of the events of August 23rd and 24th, many groups and ideologies were hatching their own plans. The concerned authorities were aware of when they were planning to agitate or strike. This would be clear to the then and current Inspector General of Police (IGP) or the Chief of Army Staff. At that time, three different groups had joined forces, although there was no complete internal consensus among them. They took advantage of the situation and advanced their plans.

• Can you recall some events from that time?

I had conversations with three members of parliament from that time. I asked them,